Special
Delivery
should be tied to strategic goals, have a time component,
and include a financial target (for example, percentage of
revenue increase, dollar amount of cost savings, or percentage of increase in sales). They should also drive innovation
activity (for example, number of ideas generated, number
of prototypes implemented, and so forth). Keep the focus
fairly narrow—define the most important outcomes to
assess, and be willing to adjust if needed to drive the right
structure and desired behaviors.
Structure— The best innovation ideas are generated once
parameters have been defined to clarify the issue at hand.
Ideally, this involves collaboration among all stakehold-
ers—including vendors, staff, customers, and end users.
The innovation process should be appropriately scaled
and structured so that all stakeholders can understand the
opportunities, the process, and the appropriate boundaries
of the initiative. It is helpful to establish a governance com-
mittee or council that will help guide the innovation efforts.
This group should be made up of key decision makers in
the organization. They will help define this structure and
ask questions such as: Will an interdisciplinary team be
established? Will innovation be a part of everyone’s job? Or
will there be an individual who is charged to lead this new
function?
Innovation is not a science; rather, it is a combination
of art and management that should become a repeatable
process for your company to help you build a culture of
creativity. The structure you develop, then, must not be so
rigid as to limit creativity and cause fear of failure.
A key deliverable of the governance stage is a matrix
that defines how potential innovation projects are to be
weighted once ideas have been generated and researched.
The weighting will be determined to some extent by your
innovation goals and measures, but there are other key
Contribution to
Strategy
25%
Low
Low contribution
to strategic
objectives
Medium
Some contribution
to strategic
objectives
High
Considerable
contribution to
strategic
objectives
Critical
Critical to
achieving
strategic
outcomes
Cost Savings
(over next
3 years)
25%
< $1 million
$1m–5m
$5–20m
> $20m
Payback Period
(short term)
20%
> 5 years
3 to 5 years
1 to 2 years
< 1 year
Resource
Requirements
(personnel and
knowledge/skills)
20%
High
Significantly
large teams
with complex
knowledge/new
technology/
outsourcing
Medium
Large teams
with complex
knowledge
Low
Medium-size
team with general
knowledge
Minimal
Small team
and general
knowledge
Execution Risk
10%
High
Groupwide or
across line of
business; new to
organization;
high external
Medium
Major initiative
across organization
and/or some
external; multiple
system impacts
Low
Within one
division area;
limited external;
new processes
and system
impacts
Minimal
Impacting only
1 to 2 teams;
trusted process;
no external
Weight
1
2
3
4
[FIGURE 2] SAMPLE PRIORITIZATION MATRIX
SOURCE: ADAPTED FROM WWW.PMOGURU.COM/PROJECT-PRIORITISATION-HOW-TO-PRIORITISE-PROJECTS/