However, much like the golfer who reaches the green of a
par- 4 hole in two strokes only to be sabotaged by his putter,
all of this enormous export potential could mean nothing
without the supply of properly positioned containers to
haul the stuff.
Since the early 1990s, the quantities of container equipment—and where they flowed
through U.S. commerce—have been pegged
to the rapid growth of imports from Asia to
the United States. However, the direction of
loaded twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU)
container movements across the Pacific is as
evenly balanced today as it has been for two
decades, according to Walter Kemmsies,
New York-based chief economist at Moffatt
& Nichol, a global infrastructure adviser.
Each March for the past four years, the
United States has come close to net exporting more loaded
TEUs than it imported, according to Kemmsies. If the trend
persists as Kemmsies expects it will, the United States will
become a net exporter of loaded containers during a year’s
first quarter, while remaining a net importer during the traditional build-up leading into peak season.
But even during the traditionally strong seasonal cycle for
imports, the directional imbalances will narrow as fast-growing Asian economies stoke year-round demand for
U.S. capital equipment and foodstuffs, among other commodities, Kemmsies said.
Another factor likely to curtail Asian import activity is
the growing practice of “near-shoring” production to
Mexico and Central America. Near-shoring, designed to
bring manufacturing closer to end markets in the United
States, reduces demand for Asian-made goods because
products can get to their destination in a few days instead of
spending weeks on the water.
around containerized imports of retail merchandise
unloaded in densely populated commerce centers is often
not geographically positioned to transload capital equipment, lumber, and agricultural products that may originate
in more remote regions.
In addition, many ship lines calling on West Coast ports are
focused on port-to-port business and don’t have large-scale
commitments with railroads to offer intermodal service to
interior U.S. points at competitive rates. Thus, the boxes
remain at or near the coast and beyond the reach of exporters.
Ted Prince, who runs a Richmond, Va.-based supply
chain consultancy bearing his name, argued the problem
isn’t the quantity of equipment moving around the country, but the cost of getting boxes to the proper export locations. “There are ‘empties’ in Dallas and Memphis, but not
in Chicago,” Prince said. “There’s plenty of equipment, but
nobody wants to pay to get it in the right place.”
Most U.S. exports do not consist of high-value goods
because of the relatively high cost of domestic labor that
goes into the production; this might explain why IT executives in the November 2010 survey were skeptical
about the United States’ doubling the value of its
exports by the end of 2014. Instead, the
nation’s exports are predominantly what
Prince classifies as “traded commodities,”
meaning they are of relatively low value and
can’t command the high per-unit selling
prices of high-tech or electronic equipment.
For ocean carriers, it is often too costly to
ship empty boxes from the original U.S.
import destination to a subsequent export
origin just to haul inexpensive commodities
to a port. Unless inland shipping costs
decline or westbound trans-Pacific rates increase—neither
of which is likely for the foreseeable future—“it’s just
cheaper for the liners to move empty boxes back to the West
Coast from their import origin points,” Prince said.
“The surplus [of equipment] is in the cities, and the
demand is in the hinterlands,” said Phillip M. Behanna, senior vice president of International Asset Systems, an
Oakland, Calif.-based firm that helps customers reposition
containerized equipment.
Henry L. (Rick) Wen Jr., vice president of business devel-opment/public affairs for the U.S. arm of liner company
Orient Overseas Container Line Inc., echoes that view.
“Imports drive the locations where equipment is abundant,
and large population centers like Los Angeles and New York-New Jersey have surplus equipment,” Wen said in an e-mail.
By contrast, exports from the Pacific Northwest and certain
Midwest markets currently face equipment deficits, he said.
Since so much export traffic originates from remote locations, Wen said, “cost becomes a factor if carriers are
expected to position empty equipment into demand areas
for lower-valued cargo.” Much of the time, he said, the
expense isn’t worth the effort.
$$$
food producers have a strong need for finished feedstock.
John Fornazor, president of Fornazor International, a
New Jersey-based producer and exporter of feeds and
grains, said at the Norfolk conference that he sees strong
potential in Africa, where arid climates make it difficult for
countries to grow their own foodstuffs. “We are very, very
high on that part of the world,” he said.
John R. Wainwright, head of international trade compliance for Leggett & Platt, a Carthage, Mo.-based manufacturer of residential, commercial, and industrial components, said international consumers’ expanding wealth and
consumption habits would be a major boon to U.S.
exporters. “I am very encouraged about the growing middle
class overseas,” he told the conference.
OFF BALANCE?
The shift in demand patterns threatens to catch the U.S.
export infrastructure flat-footed. A supply chain built