opportunities to pair headhaul and backhaul trips—a
move that would likely allow them to negotiate better rates.
To determine whether such opportunities are available,
Ananny says, shippers can pull data from their purchase
order system and feed it to the TMS as if it were an instruction to set up a shipment. If the system indicates, for
instance, that the product associated with a particular purchase order will be available tomorrow afternoon on the
supplier’s dock, the buyer could pick it up with the same
vehicle used to make a delivery to a nearby location earlier
in the day. “Both freight requirements must come together,”
he says.
GOOD IN THEORY …
All of this is good in theory, but it may be hard to achieve
in practice, even with help from a TMS. The coordination
of outbound and inbound transportation can be complicated and expensive. Furthermore, logistics managers have
to temper the simulation’s results with their own assessment of the vendor’s ability to make good on its scheduling
commitments.
“In real life, as a shipper, you don’t have a lot of control
over the vendor’s dock facilities,” Ananny points out. If a
vendor can’t meet its commitments, it could throw off
plans to pick up and deliver multiple shipments on a single
run. “The vendor says, ‘Come here at 10 a.m.,’ but [sup-pose] there’s an unforeseen circumstance and you don’t get
loaded until 2 p.m. The second pickup is in jeopardy
because that vendor doesn’t stay open long enough to
accommodate the delay,” he says. Even if the TMS suggests
multiple pickups are possible, in reality, the success rate will
be less than 100 percent, he adds.
And there’s another potential obstacle: Suppliers may be
unwilling to renegotiate the terms of sale to accommodate
a buyer that wants to take control of its inbound moves.
“The vendors may not be willing to change the way they do
business with you,” Ananny says. “The vendors may say,
‘You can pick up the freight, but we’re not going to change
our price.’”
Indeed, many suppliers are resistant to handing over
inbound control because they, too, want high shipment
volumes to use as leverage in carrier negotiations.
“Suppliers who also have scale benefits resist giving up a
portion of their scale to select customers simply because it
would de-scale their network,” explains Kumar
Venkataraman, a partner in the consumer industries and
retail practice at the consulting firm A. T. Kearney.
The takeaway: Although a transportation management
system can be valuable in helping shippers identify potential benefits of controlling inbound transportation, logistics managers should conduct any modeling exercise with
their eyes wide open. “TMS modeling can play a role in
quantifying the value as long as people doing the modeling are aware of the things that can go wrong,” Ananny
says. ;
Conveying with ease
Plate chain conveyor
The flexible conveyor system
; Multidimensional conveyor adaptable to virtually
any layout
; One conveyor to replace many, eliminating transfers,
drives, controls and installation costs
; Reusable components that can be easily
reconfigured or expanded in the future
; Chain is never under tension and requires
no lubrication or take-up
; Rolling technology allows for long runs with
minimum energy requirements
; Robust design ensures continued operations
in industrial operations
; Modular components making it quick and easy
to install
; Proven over 25 years
deniway is manufactured by Denipro AG in Weinfelden,
Switzerland and is sold, serviced and supported in North
America by their sister company, WRH Marketing Americas.
Contact us now to find out how deniway can help you.
WRH Marketing Americas
3150 Brunswick Pike, Suite 220
Lawrenceville, NJ 08648
+ 1 856-842-0600 x101, x112
Denipro-sales@wrh-marketing-americas.com
www.denipro.com