S-6 A SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT TO DC VELOCITY
approach.
The use of paper-based picking in stores stands in sharp
contrast to the automated processes found in today’s
distribution centers. When respondents were asked
what order fulfillment technologies they employed in
their DCs, the majority—64 percent—said they used a
warehouse management system (WMS) in combination
with radio-frequency technology, an approach that
allows order selectors to receive instructions in real
time as they move about the facility. Still, a third of DCs
perform order selection the old-fashioned way, using
a paper-based process in conjunction with their WMS.
Another 16 percent have deployed a voice-recognition
system, while 6 percent were using goods-to-person
automation and 6 percent a pick-to-light system.
SEPARATE BUT UNEQUAL?
With well over half the respondents filling both e-commerce and store replenishment orders from a single
DC, the question arises as to how they handle these
“hybrid” operations. The survey results indicated that
most separate the two activities. Fifty-seven percent
of respondents said they segregated their e-fulfillment
operations from their traditional store fulfillment activities. Eighty-five percent of respondents segregating
e-fulfillment reported that they had a separate, distinct
area for e-commerce within the warehouse. Along with
the physical separation, many respondents said they
maintained distinct inventory for e-commerce as well as
separate labor forces.
It appears that some use separate technology as
well. For instance, among the respondents that used
goods-to-person picking systems (roughly a quarter of
the survey participants), less than half deployed them
for both traditional and e-commerce fulfillment. About
a quarter used goods-to-person picking systems solely
for traditional fulfillment and another quarter solely for
e-fulfillment.
It was a different story, however, when it came to their
warehouse management systems. Seventy-one percent
of respondents use the same WMS to oversee both
e-commerce and traditional fulfillment within the DC.
GETTING THE BIG PICTURE
As for what software and technologies the respondents
use in their omnichannel distribution operations, most
of the survey participants are employing the traditional “supply chain execution” (SCE) applications. These
include warehouse management systems, transportation management systems, inventory optimization software, and labor management systems. (See Exhibit 2.)
But respondents are not limiting themselves to the
use of SCE tools. They’re using specialized applications
EXHIBIT 1
HOW ARE RETAILERS FILLING
E-COMMERCE ORDERS?
(Percentage of respondents)
Orders are filled through a DC that also
handles store replenishment 57
Orders are fulfilled from the store 37
Orders are filled through a Web-only DC 32
Orders are shipped direct from
manufacturer or supplier 32
Note: Participants were allowed to select multiple responses.
WHEN IT COMES TO FULFILLING ONLINE ORDERS, THE MAJORITY
OF RESPONDENTS RELY ON A “HYBRID” DC THAT ALSO HANDLES
TRADITIONAL STORE REPLENISHMENT ACTIVITIES.
EXHIBIT 2
WHAT TECHNOLOGIES DO
RETAILERS USE TO SUPPORT
OMNICHANNEL INITIATIVES?
(Percentage of respondents using the technology)
Warehouse management systems 87
Labor/workforce management software 65
Demand management software 64
Transportation management systems 60
Bar-code scanning on store floor/backroom 58
Distributed order management software 56
Reverse logistics systems 53
Inventory optimization software 51
Real-time inventory location store application 43
Total-landed-cost analytics 36
E-commerce material handling solution for DC 33
Demand shaping software 28
Demand signal repository 24
Cost-of-quality analytics 17
RFID at store 11
Note: Participants were allowed to select multiple responses.
WHEN ASKED WHAT TECHNOLOGY THEY USED TO SUPPORT
THEIR OMNICHANNEL INITIATIVES, RETAILERS OVERWHELMINGLY POINTED TO SUPPLY CHAIN EXECUTION SOFTWARE.