modal executives recognize the potential in expanding into
other commodity groups, most are too busy trying to convert dry stuff from truck to rail to take the plunge into an
unproven business with higher costs and stricter service
requirements.
“You have to make a full commitment,” said Brian
Bowers, senior vice president of intermodal and automotive
for Kansas City Southern Inc. (KCS), the Kansas City-based
railroad whose intermodal business is 100 percent dry van.
“You don’t just dip your toe into the refrigerated pool if you
want to keep your toes.”
Bowers said KCS, whose strength is its trans-border net-
work linking the United States and Mexico, plans this year
to assess the feasibility of intermodal service supporting
produce traffic out of Mexico. For now, however, KCS is too
focused on building its relatively small but fast-growing
intermodal business for trans-border dry goods to concen-
trate on a totally new intermodal service, Bowers said.
The executive also expressed doubt as to whether produce
shipments could generate enough density to justify the
extensive capital and operating investments, especially in
Mexico with its less-than-mature intermodal infrastructure.
Drew Glassman, assistant vice president for intermodal at
Eastern rail CSX Corp., agreed that the conceptual promise
clashes with today’s reality, namely the high equipment
costs, the added weight and lost cube from equipping a container with a refrigeration unit, and the concerns about
2010. During that time, it moved 750 intermodal loads
without incident, according to Gregg Zody, BNSF’s
director of sales for consumer products.
In the fall, BNSF rolled out a product called
“Flatracks” to serve flatbed truckers and industrial
shippers. Zody said the conversion opportunity to rail
from road is significant. “We’ve identified 1 million
[flatbed] loads that can be converted to intermodal,”
Zody said. He added that the service is competitive on
transit times with single-driver service.
The equipment allows each car to hold 90,000
pounds of freight, or 45,000 pounds per load. The
placement in the wellcar steadies the containers and
prevents the in-transit jarring that could lead to cargo
damage. The decks can also be collapsed so four decks
can fit in one car for return to the shipper.
NOT FOR THE FAINT OF HEART
The early adopters see intermodal opening up new
markets and geographies for flatbed the same way it
did for dry van. Pacer International, a Dublin, Ohio-based provider whose equipment accounts for about
demand and density.
CSX, whose intermodal business is predominantly dry
van, incorporates non-dry-goods traffic into its regular
intermodal network, according to Glassman. That structure
is likely to remain for quite some time, he said.
“It’s not a big enough market to justify its own sched-
ules,” Glassman said. “It would take a long time, and a lot of
density, to justify that.”
Judging by data from the trade group Intermodal
Association of North America (IANA), there’s no mad rush
to add non-dry van containers. Of the nearly 247,000 con-
tainers projected to be in service in North America in 2013,
all except 2,322 will be dry vans, IANA said. In 2012, all but
1,672 of the 235,000 containers in circulation were dry
vans, according to IANA data.
Despite the obstacles, Finkbiner, who is principal of a
consultancy called Surface Intermodal Solutions LLC and
until recently was a top sales and marketing executive at
Railex LLC, a coast-to-coast refrigerated service operated in
conjunction with CSX and the Union Pacific Railroad,
remains optimistic. As he sees it, the rails will look for new
revenue sources to offset a pronounced decline in their
bread-and-butter coal traffic. Fresh fruits and veggies, he
said, could be the ticket.
“Once a generation, the coal business bellies up,” he
said. “This is a chance for railroads to see what else is out
there.” ;
10 percent of all domestic intermodal container
moves, began using intermodal about a year ago to
compete with flatbed carriers on hauls of steel, aluminum, plastic, and pure resin from the Upper
Midwest and Great Lakes regions to Mexico.
By leveraging intermodal, industrial producers that
traditionally used trucks will have access to less-expen-sive rail service to connect far-flung supply and production points, according to Jim Commiskey, Pacer’s
vice president - automotive and Mexico.
Still, flatbed intermodal is not for the faint of heart,
Commiskey said. “There is a lot of learning in the
process, especially in how you handle the metal, and
how you keep it clean and damage-free,” he said.
Then there’s the challenge of competing against a
known quantity. Flatbed trucks remain the familiar
mode of transportation for many industrial producers.
For that reason alone, trucks are likely to continue to
be the preferred way to ship, according to Commiskey.
“Unless your cost savings [in switching to inter-modal] are significant, there is still a big comfort level
with flatbeds,” he said.