logistics costs, and assignable nonvariable costs incurred
specifically for that segment during a specified period. This
exercise was necessary for the teams to demonstrate the
increased revenue and associated profit contribution for
their initiatives.
During the first full year after the daylong collaboration
meeting, the combined before-taxes profit impact was
$4,365,799, of which BEF received $3,334,390 and GFS
received $1,031,409. A summary of the financial measure-
ments of value co-creation is provided in Figure 2. During
the first year, the companies focused on cost-savings ini-
tiatives that could be completed in a short time frame in
order to build enthusiasm and achieve BEF’s value co-cre-
ation goal of at least $2.7 million. In the second year, the
teams put more effort into revenue-generating initiatives,
such as increasing the sales of BEF food products through
GFS’s distribution channels, helping BEF conduct product
presentations to GFS’s other customers, increasing the uti-
lization of GFS’s stock items for new products, and having
GFS’s culinary team make presentations to BEF’s prod-
uct-development team.
As the teams worked together, they identified more initiatives. For example, the chemical program (distribution
of dishwashing, cleaning, and maintenance chemical products to the restaurants) was an opportunity that managers
identified after the collaboration meeting. This became the
largest profit improvement for both companies as a result
of lower prices for BEF and the segment controllable margin on the increased business for GFS.
Other new initiatives included the consolidation of the
procurement and warehousing of low-volume retail items;
the storage of food items from previous seasons at no cost;
[FIGURE 2] FINANCIAL MEASUREMENTS OF VALUE CO-CREATION FOR THE FIRST FISCAL YEAR
[SOURCE: ADAPTED FROM DOUGLAS M. LAMBERT AND MATIAS G. ENZ, “MANAGING AND MEASURING VALUE CO-CREATION IN BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS
RELATIONSHIPS,” JOURNAL OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT 28, NO. 13/14 (2012): 1588–1625.]
Company Driver 1st year benefits
Bob Evans Farms (BEF) Reduce proprietary vendors and stock-keeping units (SKUS) $234,546
Evaluation of existing vendors 180,613
Vendor freight management 31,820
Fuel surcharge 592,001
Increase backhauling 576,609
Early pay discount 288,003
Sale of excess inventory 9,526
Pricing for a specific region 225,522
Simplify the administration of courier services 5,393
Chemical program* 1,008,447
Consolidation of low-volume retail items* 72,826
Storage of items from previous seasons at no cost* 94,549
Waffle-maker return* 14,535
Subtotal 3,334,390
Gordon Food Service (GFS) Reduce proprietary vendors and SKUs 72,750
Vendor freight management 24,866
Simplify the administration of courier services 8,088
Chemical program* 850,000
Restaurant purchases from GFS’s retail stores* 75,705
Subtotal $1,031,409
TOTAL $4,365,799
*New initiative discovered by cross-functional, cross-firm team after the one-day collaboration meeting