growth, measuring and managing it
makes good sense. It is, however,
unfortunate existing approaches
miss the mark and fail to accurately
account for the true measure of loyalty, therefore, leading to unsound
results.
Conventional customer-satisfaction measures lack a consistently
viable connection to actual customer
behavior and growth. It is difficult to
determine a strong correlation
between high customer satisfaction
scores and outstanding sales growth.
In fact, in some cases, the reverse is
true. K-Mart is an outstanding example of high satisfaction scores simultaneous with its’ sales revenue going
into free-fall. The auto industry dealership surveys are replete with these
same results.
If one buys into the concept that
intense loyalty by a customer provides a supplier with extraordinary
competitive advantages leading to
greater profitable growth, then keeping it simple is the key rule of
engagement in customer-satisfaction
surveys. A guideline stating that
“you must ask the right questions” in
a customer-satisfaction-survey is
understood. It just hasn’t been
understood so well in the past.
F.F. Reichheld of Bain & Company
ranked the top questions that provide the most accurate measure of
loyalty. The top-ranked question was
far and away the most effective
across industries:
• How likely is it that you would recommend Company X to others?
Two questions were effective predictors in certain industries:
• How strongly do you agree that
Company X deserves your loyalty?
• How likely is it that you will continue to purchase products/services
from Company X?
Reichheld lists five additional
questions that he describes as “other
questions, while useful in a particular industry, had little general applicability.”2
“market” but instead, bring into play
your company and especially, use the
top executives as “market-facing”
selling tools.
When contemplating customer-satisfaction surveys keep it simple. You
might be better off employing only
the three questions Reichheld
depicts as the most important. All
others may be unnecessary. CW
[1] Dr. R. moss Kanter, “In a Recession,
Put Everyone in Marketing”, HBR,
April, 2009.
[2] Frederick F. Reichheld, “The One
Number You Need to Grow”, HBR,
December, 2003.
See Chemark’s ad this month on page 27.
T
H
E
®
Patented blending/dispersing blade design makes radical
improvement over old saw tooth designs
POLY
STAINLESS
* Most efficient and aggressive blending/dispersing blade
available.
* Provides proper combination of pumping action and shear/
dispersion essential for fast consistent results.
* Built in pumping action cuts processing time.
* Longer life due to heavier gauge construction.
* Less heat due to shorter required running time.
* Excellent for high or low speed and high or low viscosity.
* Supplied with hubs or mounting holes required to retrofit
and upgrade present equipment.
* Pumping blades without teeth are available and are excellent
for gentle blending and agitation.
CONCLUSIONS
In challenging times, don’t just rely
on your marketing department to
DESIGNERS AND MANUFACTURES OF INDUSTRIAL MIXING EQUIPMENT
INKS GROUTS
CEMENTS ETC. . . . www.connblade.com
CONN Since 1948 CO.,L.L.C.
AND
Stirrers Or Complete Units For:
PAINTS URETHANE FOAMS
ADHESIVES SLURRIES
11 SOUTH MARION STREET • WARREN, PENNA. 16365 • PHONE 814/723-7980