Business Corner
STRATEGIES & ANALYSIS
BY PHIL PHILLIPS, PH.D.
CONTRIBUTING EDITOR
PHILLIPS@CHEMARKCONSULTING.NET
Management vs. leadership:
What’s the difference?
To be a good
manager, it is
important to
understand
and imple-
ment the
qualities it
takes to be
a good leader.
Over the years I have observed experienced managers who manage as well as those who lead. Given the choice, I would prefer
working for a leader versus a manager. This seems
like a no brainer and I think most of us would
given the choice. However, after many years it is
still surprising to me that most managers do their
jobs well but are poor leaders.
It is interesting and sad that most of us with
management responsibility truly believe that
we are also very good leaders. But this is
wrong. Most of us are fooling ourselves. We
continually confuse managing a situation with
leading people in the process.
These two elements of business—situation
management and people leadership—run both
in opposition and in parallel with one another
and the result being constant blurring the
results thus confusing all parties down the
line as well as many times, at the peer level.
MANAGEMENT
Managing any situation requires a clear vision
of the results needed. This foresight is mandatory and elements that support or detract from
those results must be constantly reviewed,
massaged, changed or eliminated in the
process. Those elements could be people, systems, policies, practices and other tools being
used in the situation.
Managers must avoid emotional exercises
and force all critical decision points into an
intellectual one. Marty Clarke, in his book
“Leadership Landmines,” coined the phrase
“business before people,” which sums up this
theme. The point is that in management people
cannot get in the way of the business results.
In fact, Clarke says this in practical applications of this philosophy. “When puzzled by a
decision a manager needs to ask the following
questions in the following order 1) What is
best for the business? 2) What is best for this
person/these people?”
LEADERSHIP
It is important to understand that when managers do anything they send signals to their
team of people, who are paying attention more
than they think. This includes the way they
dress to the functions they attend socially to the
decisions they make everyday.
Every one of their moves sends a memorandum that shapes their confidence in their
manager. As subordinates they need influencers and peers ask themselves:
• Is he/she smart?
• Is he/she making a worthwhile contribution?
• Is he/she worth listening to?
• Is he/she worth following?
• Is he/she fair in your dealings?
• Is he/she credible?
• Can I have confidence in him/her?
• Does he/she have a backbone?
• Does he/she care?
• Does he/she have a hidden agenda?
• Do I trust him/her?
These are a few examples of the many questions
that are running through the minds of the people managers are trying to lead. All these questions distill down to the last question, which is
the most important: Do I trust him/her? In fact,
I like to refer to leadership as a five-letter word
called trust. Leadership is nothing more or nothing less than trust. That’s what it comes down to.
How is leadership trust observed, perceived
and processed by those experience it?
Somebody said when considering a goal, “I’ll
know it when I see it!” The same philsophy can
be applied to real leadership and trust. People
know it when they experience it in others.
The following two concepts have been tested
over many years and seem to capture the qual-