An Efficient Approach to Dispersing Pigments
April 2017 www.coatingsworld.com Coatings World | 43
used as anchors for certain pigment types.
Dispersants with aromatic rings have
an affinity for surfaces of organic pigments. They adsorb onto the surface by
van der Waals forces. Dispersants with
hydroxyl, carbonyl, or carboxyl groups
have a high affinity for the surface of inorganic pigments. These adsorb onto the
surface by hydrogen bonding or induced
dipole interactions. Amine groups have
high affinity for carbon black surfaces.
Without nitrogen, there is not much suit-ability for carbon black.
Experimental Design
For this study, two of the most difficult
pigments were chosen to prepare pigment
concentrates: yellow iron oxide and or-
ganic violet (Tables 1-2). Four 100%-ac-
tive additives were chosen to be tested,
ranging from 10% to 30% additive solids
on pigment.
•Additive A: low-molecular-weight
alkoxylate
•Additive B: medium-weight poly-
ether with aromatic groups
•Additive C: medium-weight poly-
ether phosphate with acid groups
•Additive D: high-molecular-weight
polymer with hyper-branched polyester
chains with aromatic and acid groups
All samples were made in 8-ounce
glass jars with 100 g of material to work
with. Glass beads of size 2.4-2.9 mm
were added as grinding media in a 1:1
ratio. The formulations were processed
on a Skandex shaker for one hour. After
dispersing was completed, samples were
cooled to room temperature and filtered
through a mesh cone filter.
Yellow Iron Oxide Formulations
The yellow iron oxide formulations
consist of 55% pigment loading, with
10% additive solid on pigment (ASOP).
Because of increasing environmental demands, an exempt solvent (Oxsol 100)
was chosen for this study.
Pigment Violet Formulations
Price is a big driving factor in the pigment
concentrate market. Because organic pigments are normally more expensive,
titanium dioxide was coupled in this formulation to reduce price. The pigment
loading for violet was 6% and titanium
dioxide was 30%, with 30% additive
solid on pigment.
Yellow Iron Oxide Results
Viscosity was measured on a Haake
Rheostress 1 Rheometer equipped with
PP35 Ti L03 089 plate and tested under a 0.20 mm gap at room temperature (Figure 6). Initial viscosity studies
showed that the blank and Sample A had
very shear thickening behavior, meaning
their viscosities rose along with the shear
rate. This is not ideal for pigment concentrates because it could clog the dosing
machine when tinting white base paints.
Sample B had a shear thinning viscosity
until 1000/s, where there was a rise in viscosity. This indicates that there was not
enough dispersant to wet out the remaining pigment. Samples C and D had shear
thinning curves, with viscosity being the
lowest overall for Sample D. This is attractive to pigment concentrate suppliers
because a low viscosity means more pigment loading is possible. Viscosity will
also be tested after a storage period at
elevated temperatures to confirm the performance of the additives.
The blank, Sample A, and Sample
B did not have a suitable grind after one hour of processing (Figure 7).
A suitable grind for most pigment
Figure 6. Initial room temperature viscosity for yellow iron oxide formulations.
Figure 7. Hegman grind readings after 1 hour of processing for yellow iron oxide formulations.