BY MARK B. SOLOMON, SENIOR EDITOR
MOTOR FREIGHT
enroute
movin’ on …
and on …
and on
“Continuous moves” distribution
strategies aren’t for everyone.
But under the right conditions,
they can produce double-digit
transportation savings.
ON PAPER, A “CONTINUOUS MOVES”
shipment strategy is a clear winner: A
shipper works with a few core carriers
to group a series of one-way hauls—
between suppliers, manufacturing
plants, distribution centers, and
sometimes customers—into a round
trip. The truckers benefit from fewer empty miles, less
idle time, better asset utilization, and near-regular
routes. The shipper benefits from lower rates and
guaranteed capacity. The resulting efficiencies translate into better fuel economy and a smaller carbon
footprint.
But shipping, like sports, is not played on paper. In
practice, continuous moves are complicated to engineer, difficult to execute, and effective only under certain conditions. That may explain why the model’s
two-decade track record has been spotty at best.
Yet with fuel prices again on the rise and mounting
pressure on companies to go green, continuous moves
may be worth a second look, at least by shipping operations that have the freight density and geographic profile to make it work.
Hershey keeps things rolling
One company that has embraced the concept is The
Hershey Co. In 2007, the iconic confectioner began a
comprehensive review of its transportation and distri-
bution processes. A key objective of the exercise—
dubbed “Project Overdrive”—was to create an integrated transportation program by identifying continuous moves opportunities for Hershey, its suppliers, and
its carriers.
In early 2008, Hershey and four of its core carriers
launched a pilot program of continuous moves for outbound shipments from the company’s factories to its
four U.S. distribution centers and from the DCs to
Hershey’s retail customers. Hershey went nationwide
with the outbound program later in the year. The company is currently implementing continuous moves for
inbound freight to its plants from its packaging and
commodities suppliers.
The program required Hershey to assume greater
control over its transportation. In the past, inbound
and outbound moves were managed separately.
Suppliers were often responsible for getting their
freight to Hershey’s manufacturing plants, while
Hershey managed movements between its plants and
DCs. Under that system, for example, a packaging supplier located near Hershey’s St. Louis DC would
arrange for trucks to haul packaging materials to
Hershey’s factory in Robinson, Ill. Hershey, meanwhile,
would manage outbound shipments of finished products from the Robinson plant to its St. Louis DC.
Under the new program, Hershey manages both
types of moves, which enables it to identify opportuni-