move more containers per vessel
through the canal than ever before.
It could also permanently reshape
shipping patterns if importers that
would normally bring Asian-origi-nating cargo in through West Coast
ports for movement inland via surface transport opt instead for a less-costly all-water route for drop-off at
East and Gulf Coast ports. Only 30
percent of all seagoing cargoes are
discharged at points east of the
Mississippi, although 70 percent of
the U.S. population lives there.
Miami port officials estimate an all-water voyage from China to Miami
takes 24 days, while a sailing into Los
Angeles and cross-country rail service
to Miami would take about 22 days
and generally be more expensive.
In preparation for the canal
expansion, Miami has embarked on
a $150 million project—with half
the funds coming from state taxpay-
ers—to dredge its harbor and chan-
nel from its current 42-foot depth
to the 50-foot depth needed to
accommodate the larger “post-
Panamax” ships. Perhaps just as
important, the port is constructing
the first on-dock rail terminal to be
operational there in 20 years.
A SHIFT IN DISTRIBUTION
PATTERNS
Officials at Miami, which vies with
Port Manatee on Florida’s West
Coast for the title of the closest U.S.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;;;;; ;;;;;;;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;;;;;;;;;;
;;;;;;;;
;;;;;;;;
;;; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
port to the canal, believe the deepening of
Miami’s harbor and the launch of on-dock
rail service will make it the first port of call
for post-Panamax vessels. They also contend
the expansion project will change the way
goods are distributed within Florida, across
the Southeast, and even into the nation’s
midsection.
“We will be able to serve markets like
Atlanta and Charlotte in two days, and
Memphis and Nashville in three days,” said
James Hertwig, FEC’s president and CEO.
FEC is also the exclusive on-dock rail
provider at Fort Lauderdale’s Port
Everglades and the Port of Palm Beach farther to the north.
Between 12 million and 13 million people reside in Central and South Florida,
making it the largest East Coast population
center outside of the New York metropolitan area. Because of its large retiree and
tourist population, however, the region is
heavily skewed toward consumption, with
relatively little production.
Historically, goods bound for Central
and South Florida have been produced in
manufacturing centers in South Georgia or
Northern Florida around Jacksonville.
They would then usually be trucked—at a
significant cost—down the lengthy peninsula to the southern part of the state, or be
diverted west toward its center near
Orlando. Generally, there are few backhaul
opportunities due to the lack of manufacturing in the region.
The traffic imbalance is striking, according to various sources. Hertwig said that for
every four loads headed south there is only
one moving north. Charles W. Clowdis,
managing director-transportation advisory
services for consultancy IHS Global
Insight, said the ratio is closer to five to one
in favor of southbound loads.
But as more Florida-bound goods come
from Asia, all that could change. Florida
port interests maintain that deepening
Miami’s harbor to handle post-Panamax
vessels will open up the state’s Southern
and Central regions to an avalanche of
Asian imports that can be whisked across
Florida and into surrounding states, thus
remedying the directional imbalance.
In a 2010 report, the Florida Chamber
Foundation said the widening of the canal,
along with the continued growth in Latin