DC Velocity - August 2013

FedEx, plaintiffs reach
$21.5 million settlement in
overcharge dispute

FedEx Corp. and a class of about 200,000 plaintiffs reached a tentative $21.5 million settlement to resolve allegations that FedEx overcharged commercial customers by misclassifying their shipments as residential deliveries to extract higher surcharges from the shippers.

According to Steven J. Rosenwasser, an Atlanta attorney representing two of the FedEx customers, the company will pay about $16.5 million in monetary claims to the class. In addition, the proposed settlement would bar the company from continuing practices that allegedly led to the misclassifications and subsequent overcharges. The value of that relief is pegged at about $5 million, Rosenwasser said July 29.

A hearing was scheduled for Aug. 1 before a federal district court in Memphis, Tenn., to approve the settlement on a preliminary basis. Notice is then given to members of the class, who can accept the terms or opt out of the settlement. Rosenwasser expects the court to grant preliminary approval at the hearing. The court will then issue a final ruling later this year.

Shea Leordeanu, a FedEx spokeswoman, confirmed that a
settlement was reached but declined comment on the details.

According to Rosenwasser, FedEx will issue nearly full refunds, before deductions for attorneys’ fees, to customers that, according to the company’s data, had requested and were denied refunds for improper residential delivery charges within 60 days of the shipping date. For those who

Mexico. The new solution, which comprises a sophisticated warehouse management system, integrates with Walmart’s new online shopping site and enables same-day order fulfillment and next-day delivery. … Women’s apparel retailer Lilly Pulitzer has selected Manhattan Associates’ Enterprise Order Management and Store Order Fulfillment solutions to support its omnichannel retail capabilities. European fashion retailer Eram Group has also selected Manhattan’s Enterprise Order Management as well as its Store Inventory & Fulfillment and Warehouse Management solutions to enable the company’s omnichannel business transformation. Finally, Manhattan says that driver retention has increased at Celadon Trucking Inc., thanks in part to solutions from Manhattan’s Carrier Management product suite.

go figure …

$50 million The annual fuel cost reductions UPS Inc. realizes for each mile a driver saves when operating across its global network.

SOURCE: COMPANY DATA

did not file a refund request within the 60-day window,
FedEx will refund about 20 percent of the shipment
charges, prior to fees, even if the shipping occurred as far
back as August 2008, Rosenwasser said.
All class members who opt in to the settlement will
receive no less than $5 even if the alleged overcharge
involved just one shipment, he said.

“SUBSTANTIAL BENEFITS TO THE CLASS”

Last December, attorneys filed a 170-page complaint charging that Memphis-based FedEx and its corporate support division, FedEx Services, misrated tens of millions of commercial transactions as residential deliveries so it could collect millions of dollars in illicit overcharges. The behavior went on for years despite repeated warnings from inside the company that it had become a systemic practice encouraged by executives, according to the allegations.

The complaint was filed under the federal Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly
known as RICO. If a civil action under RICO is successful,
a plaintiff or plaintiffs can collect “treble damages,” which
are damages tripling the amount of actual and compen-
satory damages.
DC VELOCITY reported extensively on the dispute in
mid-January.

The legal dispute began in February 2011, when an immigration law firm in the Atlanta suburb of Alpharetta, Ga., filed a breach of contract suit against FedEx and FedEx Services. The law firm said the carrier and the unit misclassified commercial shipments as residential deliveries to collect higher surcharges. Residential surcharges are generally higher than commercial surcharges because residential deliveries are deemed more costly for the carrier to make because the locations are often harder to reach and there is a lack of delivery density.

Delivery surcharges are one of many “accessorial fees”
levied by parcel carriers to offset the cost of services
beyond the basic pickups and deliveries.

Rosenwasser said the proposed agreement provides “substantial benefits to the class” by not only providing monetary relief but also by putting an end to many of the practices that the plaintiffs said had caused the overcharges. ;