techwatch
WITH THEIR ABILITY TO TRACK THE LOCATION OF TRUCKS
and trailers, yard management systems (YMS) can alleviate the chaos
in a busy distribution center (DC) yard. For instance, they can help
ease a logjam at the gate by automating vehicle check-in and check-out, or help users pinpoint which trailer contains goods that need to
be unloaded right away to fill an order.
Although this type of software has been around for a number of
years, it hasn’t exactly caught fire among logistics professionals. A
recent DCV survey offers some clues as to why this is the case.
The survey itself was conducted via an online poll earlier this fall.
Of the 115 logistics managers who participated in our survey, only
33 percent said they were using yard management software in their
operations. As for which industries these YMS users
worked in, 38 percent said they were in the whole-sale/distribution business, 25 percent in retailing,
and another 25 percent in transportation/logistics.
Manufacturers accounted for just 12 percent of the
YMS users.
Asked how long they’ve been using the software,
the largest share of YMS users— 47 percent—said
they had been using their yard management system
for one to five years. Another 30 percent said they’d
been using it for six to 10 years, while 20 percent
had used the software for more than 10 years. Only
3 percent said they’d been using the software for less
than one year. Given the small percentage of new
users, the survey results suggest the YMS market is
seeing only nominal growth.
In addition, the research indicates that it’s mainly large companies
that have deployed a YMS. In fact, 42 percent of the YMS users in our
survey worked for companies with revenues in excess of $1 billion.
Thirty-one percent of users were from companies with between $10
million and $99 million in revenue, and 24 percent worked for companies with revenues between $100 million and $999 million. Only 3
percent of YMS users worked at companies with revenues of less than
$10 million.
When asked about the type of YMS software they were using, the
majority of users— 57 percent—said they used a standalone applica-
tion. Another 40 percent said their YMS was a module in their ware-
house management system (WMS), and 3 percent said it was a module
in their transportation management system (TMS). Among other
findings, the survey revealed that the yard management systems used
by smaller companies are typically standalone applications, while those
used by big corporations (those with $1 billion
or more in revenue) are generally a component
of their WMS systems.
When asked to name the number one benefit
of using the software, 61 percent of the YMS
users cited improved yard visibility. Another
14 percent said the software had brought about
improvements in their daily DC operations.
Other benefits cited included a reduction in DC
labor costs and enhanced inventory efficiency
(each mentioned by 11 percent).
However, the fact remains that the majority of survey takers reported
that they had not deployed a
yard management system at
their facilities. When asked
about their reasons, a third of
the non-users— 33 percent—
said they saw no value in
the application. Another 18
percent said the software was
too expensive, while 11 percent did not send or receive
freight by truck, making
usage a moot point.
What was particularly
interesting were the explanations given by the other
Although a YMS seems warranted in operations that deal with swarms of trucks, the
software’s use appears limited for now to large
companies with extremely busy yards. Clearly,
many small and medium-sized companies
don’t feel they have the volume of traffic to
justify the time, money, and effort.
Who’s using YMS and why
(or why not)
BY JAMES COOKE, EDITOR AT LARGE