DC Velocity - December 2009

acrossthedock

fan mail?

Re: “power down,” September 2009

I enjoyed your article about DCs struggling with high energy costs. We operate about 5 million square feet in our company, and a good deal of it was in dire need of both retrofitting and an ongoing [energy conservation] program a few years back. Since we began our program in 2008, we have reduced our expense everywhere we have installed our new attitude, equipment, and outlook toward our energy usage.

By the way, we installed Big Ass fans about three years ago, the first effort in meaningful amp reduction in our DCs. We have saved over $500,000 in our lighting expense in the past two years at one facility alone.

So, anyway, the message is that there are real savings out there, and your examples are not just isolated events.

John Zapata, Rooms To Go

letters to the editor

Letters should be written exclusively to DC VELOCITY and may contain thoughts, comments, suggestions and criticisms of both DC VELOCITY and developments in the supply chain field. They should not exceed 200 words and may be edited for clarity. The decision to publish or not to publish is solely at the discretion of the editor.

All letters must include the author’s daytime phone number. Send submissions to: “To the Editor,” DC VELOCITY, 500 East Washington St., Suite 4, N. Attleboro, MA 02760 or to peter@dcvelocity.com with “To the Editor” in the subject line.

creative thinking

Re: “outsourcing the wheel,” December 2009 (and online at www.dcvelocity.com)

I really love the fact that companies are getting creative with outsourcing— it shows that there are inventive ways of providing value in outsourcing. The rule—if someone can add value better, faster, or more cheaply (and with fewer accidents!), then you outsource!

Now, the real test is to select providers that optimize your operations and don’t just “buy service” or “cut costs.” Great providers optimize to solve the problem, and the service providers make a fair profit for their brainpower in solving the problem—not just providing butts in seats (or in this case, drivers in trucks).

I really like the various options for business models they lay out—it’s not all about simple shift and lift. Now, I’m wondering if the Ryder deal or any of the other solutions ProDrivers provides is a Vested Outsourcing solution. That would be progressive thinking!