Round 1: Teamsters present initial contract proposal to UPS
Every five years, UPS Inc. and the Teamsters union step into
the ring to negotiate the nation’s biggest collective bargaining agreement. Riding on the outcome are the livelihoods
of about a quarter of a million workers and the fate of nearly 16 million parcels and letters tendered or received by 8. 8
million global customers.
The opening bell has sounded.
UPS and the Teamsters renewed their vows Sept. 27 in
Washington with the Teamsters formally presenting UPS
with initial proposals for two contracts. The big contract
covers between 240,000 and 250,000 employees in the company’s small-package operations. The smaller one governs
an additional 12,000 to 13,000 workers in its UPS Freight
less-than-truckload (LTL) unit.
The launch date is unusual in that it comes about 10 months
before the July 31, 2013, expiration of both five-year contracts.
The two sides agreed to the early start. The Teamsters said the
time was right given the tough economy and UPS’s strong
financial condition. UPS declined comment.
Ken Hall, who is heading the Teamsters’ negotiating
team, spent Sept. 21 in Chicago briefing a cluster of local
union officials representing UPS and UPS Freight on key
contract issues. In a Sept. 24 post on the union’s website,
the Teamsters said the “UPS and UPS Freight proposals
were unanimously approved” by the local unions. The
Teamsters would not comment beyond that.
In a document posted on its website, Teamsters for a
Democrat Union (TDU), a dissident group often at odds
with the union establishment led by longtime General
President James P. Hoffa, said Hall told the locals he would
keep union demands modest at UPS Freight because the
unit had not been profitable.
BIG FOCUS ON SMALL PACKAGES
Most of the attention, however, will be focused on the
small-package bargaining. According to TDU, the union’s
proposals include increases in pension payments, including
hikes for the 48,000 full-time UPS workers that in 2007
were transferred from the Teamsters’ Central States multi-employer pension plan to one that is jointly administered
by UPS and the union.
According to TDU, the Teamsters proposal also calls for
wage increases, especially in starting pay for part-timers. All
part-time workers, other than sorters and pre-loaders, start
at $8.50 an hour.
Another objective, according to TDU, is to force UPS to
honor its commitment to convert thousands of part-time
Teamsters jobs to full-time positions. A provision of the
2007 contract requires UPS to offer part-timers the chance
to fill at least 20,000 full-time operational jobs during the
life of the contract. Six of every seven available full-time
jobs would have to be staffed by former part-timers,
according to the contract.
Ken Paff, TDU’s veteran chief organizer and one of
Hoffa’s fiercest critics, said UPS has not lived up to its end
of the bargain over the past five years, and union leadership
hasn’t held the company’s feet to the fire.
‘SUREPOST’ COULD BE A FACTOR
TDU indicated that Hall wants UPS to propose language to
protect Teamsters jobs threatened by the growth of the
company’s delivery relationship with the U.S. Postal Service
(USPS), in return for the “union’s continued cooperation”
with the program, known as UPS SurePost.
Under SurePost, UPS tenders parcels to the USPS, which
then takes the shipments the so-called “last mile” from the
local post office to destination. The program, tailored to e-commerce shipments from online merchants to residences, is
inexpensive for shippers. In many cases, it gives e-merchants
the latitude to offer free shipping to their customers, a feature
that often cements an online sale. UPS rivals FedEx Corp. and
DHL Express have similar relationships with USPS.
Since the program began to take off, the Teamsters have
grumbled that it reduces the need for more drivers. ;