are losers, and then to structure supply chain policies such
that some or all of the losers are turned into winners. This
may require changing the replenishment model and service-level agreements for a specific customer/product combination. For example, a tire manufacturer that provides
the same one-day lead time for both A customers and D
customers may want to change the policy to three days for
the D customers. This would move the inventory buffer
point upstream in the supply chain, reducing overall
inventory. The upstream buffer would hold a larger pool of
inventory, thus increasing the odds that downstream
demand will be satisfied with the exact product required.
This change may have the effect of turning D customers
into B customers.
2. Implement differentiated demand policies in core
functions
It was not too long ago that demand was thought of as a
single requirement to which the supply chain reacted.
Today, we know that demand signals can come in the form
of orders, forecasts, and safety stock, and that they can
come from different channels (retail, Web, distributors, and
enterprise) and from different sources (original equipment
manufacturers [OEMs], aftermarket/spares). Furthermore,
demand signals can come from different customer types, as
discussed in the previous section (large, highly profitably
customers versus small, unprofitable customers).
In order for the supply chain to align with segmenta-
tion strategies, the demand signals within core supply
chain management functions—such as master planning,
transportation planning, distribution planning, and fac-
tory planning—must be prioritized in a way that aligns
with those strategies. The demand priorities must be
driven by the overall segmentation strategy that is tied to
the service/profitability framework discussed in the pre-
vious section.
3. Implement differentiated inventory policies
Inventory may be the area where supply chain segmentation has been employed most often in the past five years.
Inventory optimization has progressed during that period
to become a process-driven discipline of regularly determining what inventories to carry, where, in what form, and
in what quantities across a multiechelon network. Once
again, this starts with the foundational step of understanding the value propositions offered for each customer/product intersection. Based on this information, companies use
analytic tools to evaluate the entire network and determine
the stocking policies for each product at each stocking
location.
This process will include determining how much fin-ished-goods inventory to carry downstream at regional distribution centers (DCs), upstream at central DCs, and at
factory locations. It will also include deciding where to
incorporate postponement strategies by determining how
much inventory to carry in semifinished mode or as com-
[FIGURE 4] EXAMPLE PROFITABILITY DECISION FRAMEWORK
Customer Profitability Cluster Analysis
Customer/Product Profitability
Cluster Analysis
High
Volume
C2
D1
C1
C3
D2
A2
B1
A1
A3
B2
High
Volume
Low
P4
P3
P1
P2
Low
D3
B3
HighLow
Profit margin
Low
High
Profit margin
SOURCE: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP INC.