SEGMENTATION REDUCES DEMAND UNCERTAINTY
An engine manufacturer that makes a full line of
engines for multiple applications, including energy,
marine, and transportation, recently segmented its
supply chain in order to offer different options for its
customers. The engines are highly configurable, meaning that customers can order a base configuration and
then select from a menu of options.
Figure 7 provides an overview of the different segmentation strategies the engine manufacturer put in
place to serve its customers.
The goal of the segmentation program was to offer
different value propositions to its customers based on
the type of product ordered. The supply chain fulfillment, inventory, and manufacturing policies would
then be aligned to each value proposition. The value
propositions were primarily driven by how much flexibility the customer wanted to have in the ordering
process. For different levels of flexibility, the manufacturer offered different price points and lead times.
As shown in Figure 7, the manufacturer established
four basic segments:
• Standard configurations
• Standard configurations, but greater choice
• Customer-configured from a catalog of options
• Customer-specific requirements that must be ana-
lyzed and quoted
Based on this restructuring of the ordering process,
the manufacturer then established different push-pull
points in the supply chain from which each of the seg-
ments would be served. This dramatically reduced
demand uncertainty by providing different forecasting
points in the supply chain, thus taking advantage of the
pooling effect.
For standard configurations, the manufacturer
would forecast end items. For standard configurations
with greater choice, it would forecast the options that
went into the end item. With each level of increasing
flexibility the manufacturer was able to move the
response buffer and associated forecast item
upstream in the supply chain. This had the effect of
dramatically improving forecast accuracy. Prior to
implementing this approach, the manufacturer had
only been forecasting a wide variety of end items,
which had resulted in very low forecast accuracy.
[FIGURE 7] EXAMPLE OF SEGMENTED SERVICE
Strategies
MTS, 5 pre-configured packages
CTO, limited
pre-configured
MTO, customer-configured
Customer-specific
requirements
Engineering
T2
Push
Push
Pull
T1
Push
Assembly
Pull
Customers
Pull
Pull
Customer Value
Proposition
(LT = lead time;
P = price; O = options)
LT: 10 weeks
P:
O:
LT: 16 weeks
P:
O:
LT: As quoted
P:
O:
MTS = make to stock CTO = configure to order MTO = make to order T1 and T2 = Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers
SOURCE: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP INC.