FANS FROM THE INNOCENT EARLIER DAYS OF POP
music might remember the monster hit “Joy to the World”
by Three Dog Night. But an earlier Jeremiah was a prophet in the Kingdom of Judah, the “weeping prophet” who
urged reform and repentance. He is recognized in Judaism,
Islam, Christianity, and Baha’i. Some think that I might
be modeling Jeremiah, but my own views are not quite as
pessimistic.
TILTING AT THE WINDMILL DU JOUR
As we navigate the tortuous pathways of contemporary
sourcing and procurement, hands, tendrils, and teeth reach out for us, much
like the underwater creatures—
grindy-lows, merpeople, and such—who sought
to ensnare Harry Potter. One hand that
might be judged as either harming or
helping belongs to the corporate legal
function. Sometimes, the appendage is a
talon that captures and cuts; sometimes,
it’s a hand that reaches out and offers a
pull toward safety and away from almost
certain disaster.
Finding a positive balance in the relationship between legal and the sourcing/
procurement functions can be challenging. On the one
hand, we are charged with finding reliable, sustainable,
high-quality, cost/value-effective, and easy-to-work-with
sources, suppliers, providers, manufacturers, and distributors of products, components, materials, technology,
software, consulting, project solutions, paper clips, and
other elements that make our businesses possible—and
profitable.
On the other hand, we must accomplish our mission in
ways that do not jeopardize the enterprise or leave it open
to failure, litigation, business interruption, or scandal. And
here is where legal peeks over our transom to—legitimate-
ly—make sure we are playing by the right rules.
LAWYERS RUN AMOK
In some organizations, the legal function has taken con-
trol of, or exercises universal veto power over, contracts,
BY ART VAN BODEGRAVEN AND
KENNETH B. ACKERMAN basictraining
Jeremiah was NOT a bullfrog!
agreements, RFx (requests for information,
proposals, or quotations), and foundational
qualifications for any provider of goods or
services to the enterprise. In the immediate environment, the consequences might
include fights to the death between the supply chain or procurement functions and legal
over all issues, both trivial and game-chang-ing; delay; wasted energy; diminished attention to the really important issues; and the
unnecessary involvement of senior leadership in schoolyard brawls.
In others, legal is a trusted and valued ally in crafting appropriate contracts
with prudent corporate
safeguards in place. To be
blunt, it is procurement’s
responsibility to: 1) take
the lead in building productive collaborative relationships with legal; and
2) build, acquire, and
demonstrate capability in
the fundamentals of con-
tracting and provider management.
FIRST STEPS IN SOLVING THE RIDDLE
Here are some questions to ask, if you head
up the sourcing and procurement functions
in your organization. Your answers may lead
to a revelation of what you might consider
next:
b Are there clear thresholds and classifications that define when and how to use RFPs,
RFIs, RFQs, and other instruments? Have
these been defined by you or by legal (or
another function)?
b Does legal hold sway over all bidding and
contracting processes? Does this delay or
confuse selection and award processes and
timelines?