Str
at
eg
y
A
R
C
WA
R
EHOU
S
E
IM
P
ROV
EM
EN
T
ST
UDY
common management practices are followed and to highlight differences in how they are applied. Specifically, they
examined four management strategies and asked respondents whether they deployed those techniques. (While
the survey did not tie specific management practices to
improvements in labor retention, it did find a statistical
correlation between organizations that follow the practices
and those that reported lower turnover.) Those practices
are as follows:
1The 360-degree review. Unlike a traditional performance review, which relies almost exclusively on feedback from
the worker’s supervisor, the 360-degree review includes
input not just from the worker’s boss but from his or her
colleagues and their assistants as well.
More than 51 percent of respondents to our survey said
they practice 360-degree reviews, soliciting feedback from
a variety of sources on an employee’s performance in areas
like communication (92.5 percent), teamwork (90.6 percent), leadership (83 percent), collaboration (81.1 percent),
and decision-making (67.9 percent).
One of the keys to conducting a successful
360-degree review is promising anonymity
to floor-level employees when asking them
to evaluate their superiors. “Without keeping it anonymous, you’re probably not
going to get as much out of it as if you did,”
Banker said. And indeed, 92.3 percent of
respondents who conducted such reviews
said they kept the responses confidential.
2Training managers on effective coach- ing techniques. While there may be no
one right way to coach employees, there
are plenty of wrong ways—failing to provide timely feedback, yelling, and offering
vague (or unhelpful) criticism, to name
a few. To help keep coaching sessions on
track, nearly three-quarters (73.5 percent)
of respondents said they provide training to
managers on how to give effective performance feedback. In fact, they consider this
training so important that most companies
provide it repeatedly, offering instruction
to managers when they are hired or promoted ( 44. 6 percent), through a refresher
course every year (42.2 percent), and after
a performance review if necessary ( 30. 1 percent).
As for what’s typically covered in the training, topics
range from the timing of the feedback to the clarity of the
content to the method of presentation. In many cases, the
sessions also included a rundown of the facility’s standard
operating procedures (SOPs). (See Exhibit 4.)
3Developing objective performance measures. While it’s common practice in DCs to measure employees’ performance, the researchers found there is no clear agreement
on the best way to do it.
For instance, when it came to the basis for the feedback,
the survey found a wide variety of industry practices. Nearly
51 percent of respondents said they based their feedback on
whether employees were following “fully documented”
SOPs. But plenty of others were forced to rely on murkier
standards: The remaining 49 percent said their assessments
were based on SOPs they described as “mostly” or “poorly”
documented.
Likewise, while 46. 8 percent of respondents based
employment feedback on labor standards set through engi-
Less than 10%
11 to 20%
21 to 30%
31 to 40%
41 to 50%
51 to 60%
61 to 70%
More than 70%
16.1%
12.9%
7.5%
8.6%
16.1%
10.8%
6.5%
21.5%
0 5 10 15 20 25
Importance of timely feedback 86.7%
Importance of clear feedback 83.1%
To give positive reinforcement before negative feedback 71.1%
Examples of clear versus unclear feedback 62.7%
Importance of objective feedback versus personal feedback 62.7%
To give negative feedback with a calm voice and a gentle manner 47%
Invite employees to share feedback on the manager’s performance before
giving their own 39.8%
Importance of making sure employees are told when SOPs are not being
followed 20.5%
Test on knowledge of SOPs 18.1%
EXHIBIT 3
What is your best estimate of the
percentage of your operation’s new hires
who have previous experience working in
a warehouse?
EXHIBIT 4
What is included in training managers to give
feedback?