newsworthy
FOOD INDUSTRY MANUFACTURers and retailers can generate large cost
savings by collaborating to reduce the
volume of “unsalable” items, such as
damaged or expired goods, in their
supply chains, according to experts
attending a consumer packaged-goods
(CPG) conference
earlier this month.
The effort can generate quick returns
by addressing the $15
billion of goods the
industry tosses out
every year, according to Daniel Triot,
senior director for
the Trading Partner
Alliance (TPA), a joint industry
affairs-industry relations leadership
group formed by the trade groups the
Grocery Manufacturers Association
(GMA) and the Food Marketing
Institute (FMI). But the effort will take
close collaboration between partners
such as manufacturers and retailers,
Triot said at the TPA Supply Chain
Conference in San Diego.
The three most efficient strategies
for reaching that goal are enhanced
shelf-life management, effective management of discontinued items, and
sharing of universal product code
(UPC)-level data, according to a joint
study by the TPA and its research
partner, pallet vendor and supply
chain solutions provider CHEP.
The two groups recently conducted
an industry survey ranking the effec-
tiveness of 48 strategies for reducing
unsalables through more effective sup-
ply chain management. The research
“uncovered clear patterns for reducing
unsalable goods,” Ben Eugrin, CHEP’s
director of supply chain solutions, said
in a statement. “We now know how
retailers, manufacturers, and suppli-
ers, working togeth-
er, can generate sig-
nificant cost savings
that positively impact
their bottom line.”
The partners plan
to launch an educa-
tional platform this
fall, sharing detailed
information and
tools to help manu-
facturers and retail-
ers review their sup-
ply chains and implement effective
unsalables-reduction strategies. The
platform will crowd-source evolv-
ing unsalables-reduction strategies,
the partners said. Strategies already
in development include reducing the
high disposal costs of hazardous mate-
rials such as batteries and hairspray
cans, and generating a return on food
waste by recycling expired products
for livestock feed, Eugrin said.
“The key principle is that we need to
improve collaboration between trading partners,” Eugrin said in an interview. “That can be helpful because not
all companies have someone in charge
of unsalables. There can be a difference in perspective between manufacturers and retailers, and retailers and
CPG companies might have different interests, so how can we connect
them?”
—Ben Ames
Food retailers name three
ways to cut “unsalable”
goods out of supply chain UPS Inc. and FedEx Corp. are
offering a new type of pricing
for deliveries within a 50-mile
radius, according to a person
familiar with the companies’
strategy. The move is designed
to divert local “last mile” busi-
ness-to-consumer traffic that
would normally be handled by
the U.S. Postal Service (USPS).
Short-haul shipments delivered by the two giants would
fall under a new “zone 1” rating, according to the person.
UPS and FedEx would price
those deliveries cheaply, largely
because they wouldn’t involve
the use of over-the-road line-haul services that add to the
carriers’ costs. The pricing has
been made available to a select
group of large customers that
have requested it, according to
the person.
For rating purposes, the
United States is divided into
eight geographic parcel zones.
Zone 8 represents the longest
lengths of haul, and generally
the highest pricing. UPS and
FedEx both offer zone 2 rates,
but those apply to deliveries
made over longer distances that
require a line-haul component.
Historically, Atlanta-based
UPS and Memphis, Tenn.-based
FedEx have either turned away
requests for local origin-destina-tion deliveries, slapped on a surcharge, or imposed higher zone
2 rates. That’s because their
elaborate package-sortation
networks are not structured to
support the inbound
UPS, FedEx roll out
pricing for ultra-short-haul deliveries
p. 18