consumer items do result in the loss of
profit for many American companies,
counterfeit auto and industrial parts can
cost lives.
The illegal business of stolen IP orig-
inates from China’s shaky past. Histori-
cally there has been very little if any
protection of intellectual property rights
(IPR) inside China. In the early days the
Chinese were eager to acquire foreign
technology and often pursued such de-
sires with an aggressive licensing strat-
egy. There was an incident several years
ago reported in the Chinese newspapers
whereby one Chinese company had li-
censed critical technology from a foreign
company. The newspaper report read
something like the following: “One Chi-
nese company has licensed technology
now all Chinese companies have that
technology.”
Last March, the United States Interna-
tional Trade Commission banned imports
of cast steel railway wheels made by the
Chinese group Tianrui. Tianrui had hired
nine employees from the Chinese licensee
of Amsted Industries of Chicago, a maker
of railway parts. They came with an arm-
ful of trade secrets that allowed Tianrui to
muscle into the business.
This type of intellectual property theft
is increasingly common, according to
many American companies operating in
China. In fact, some companies say, it is
tacitly supported by Beijing, and includes
forcing foreigners to disclose their technology in order to gain contracts.
China’s attempt to move up the tech
ladder is understandable. Many countries
in history have pursued technological
progress by first trying to piggyback on
foreign inventions before blazing their
own trails. Still, intellectual property mis-appropriation through theft cannot be a
legitimate government policy goal, especially in a country the size of China, which
can and does flood world markets with ill-begotten high-tech products.
For almost 20 years the U.S. and other
countries have been aggressively pressing
China to improve its intellectual property
protection regime. Yet China continues to
be the number one source for counterfeit
and pirated goods seized at our border, accounting for 79 percent of the total value
China
seized in 2009. The Chinese government
itself estimates that counterfeits constitute
between 15 and 20 percent of all products
made in China and are equivalent to
about eight percent of China’s annual
gross domestic product. As you can see,
this isn’t a trivial matter.
I recall many past negotiations with
representatives of the Chinese government whereby they were interested in licensing true state-of-the-art technology.
My company’s belief at that time was
that the Chinese market for that particular technology was not sufficiently developed and that the best approach would
be through the use of some of our older
technology. Part of the rationale for our
pursuing this “older technology” scenario was based on fear that we would
lose our significant technological edge in
the marketplace if we licensed our state-of-the-art products to the Chinese. Fortunately for us, at that time, the Chinese
market was a nonevent. It was not large,
not growing, not a critical market for our
eventual success in the global market.
Obviously, that situation is not true
today for any participant who wishes to
be a true global player in the Coatings
market. However, even though the Chinese market is very attractive the issue of
how to protect your IP has not changed
from those earlier days.
It is noteworthy to point out that in
the late 70s, early 80s the legal process
for both protection and prosecution of
IP theft inside China was essentially nonexistent. There have been significant
changes, on the surface, to that situation.
Unfortunately, most of these changes
have been on paper rather than rooted
in reality.
Has the Chinese IP theft
concerns abated over
the years?
The answer to that question is no. It has
gotten worse. The combination of deteriorating IP enforcement, domestic protectionism and human resource constraints
are restricting the opportunities for foreign companies seeking to compete fairly
in China, or so says a recent key business
survey conducted by the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai.
The annual China business report surveyed 346 American companies operating
in China and highlights lingering concerns
over issues such as bureaucracy and unclear regulations.
According to this year’s survey, 71 percent of respondents feel enforcement of
IPR “stayed the same” or “deteriorated,”
up from 61 percent in 2009 and 64 percent in 2008. IP remains a top concern because U.S. companies perceive a lack of
protection and enforcement for intellectual property rights to be a blow to their
competitive advantage and is costing U.S.
companies billions of dollars. The American Chamber of Commerce survey also
noted that nearly 80 percent of companies
surveyed agree that China’s regulatory environment is not transparent, though
China has demonstrated an increased
commitment to transparency. Although
most American companies who have operations inside China are concerned about
IPR issues the opportunities for growth
that China represents often overshadow
concerns of IP theft.
What does China have in place
for the protection of your IP?
Since joining the World Trade Organization (WTO) about ten years ago, China
has strengthened its legal framework and
amended its IPR and related laws and
regulations to comply with the WTO
agreement on Traded-Related Aspect of
Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs). Despite stronger statutory protection on
paper, China continues to be a haven for
counterfeiters and pirates. According to
one copyright industry association, the
piracy rate remains one of the highest in
the world at more than 90 percent and
U.S. companies lose over one billion dollars in legitimate business each year to
piracy. On average, 20 percent of all consumer products in the Chinese market
are likely counterfeit. If a product sells in
any part of the world, it is likely to be illegally duplicated inside China. U.S. companies are not alone, as pirates and
counterfeiters target both foreign and domestic companies.
Although there appears to be serious
commitment on the part of many central
government officials to tackle the prob-