Plasma Treatment and UV Coating
Adhesion
Atmospheric plasma treatment has been proven to be especially effective at improving adhesion of UV cure liquid coatings.
Successes include using plasma to improve adhesion to polyamide fascia used in automotive interiors (Melamies, 2012). shows
the beneficial effects of plasma treatment for coating biomedical
devices (Oehr, 2003) and surface treatment for coating PC and
PMMA plastics (Gururaj et al. 2011).
Contact angle measurements provide a highly accurate, and
quantitative means to assess surface energy since a smaller contact angle is directly associated with greater wettability. Figure 2
shows the effect of plasm treatment on PC and PMMA plastics.
Plasma increased the contact angle on the PC substrate from 80o
before treatment, to 43o after plasma treatment and on PMMA
from 65o before treatment to 55o after plasma treatment.
The successful use of plasma for UV liquid coatings can
also be extended to UV cure powder coatings. UV powder was
commercialized in 1998, and has expanded the applications for
powder coating beyond metal goods to markets that require
more heat-sensitive substrates such as plastics and wood. The
allure of UV powder coatings is that they combine the durability, cost efficiency, and environmentally friendly characteristics
of conventional powder coatings with the low temperatures and
fast speed afforded by UV crosslinking (Mills, 1998). However,
difficulties in achieving adhesion of UV powder coatings has
also been reported (Skinner, 2003).
Recently, some of these adhesion problems have been overcome using atmospheric plasma surface treatment. Plasma
treatment is a safe, inexpensive and environmentally desirable
alternative to traditional cleaning methods such as solvent wipe,
reformulation or flame treatment. Active species in the oxygen
combine with UV energy to drive a chemical reaction that removes surface contaminants, eliminating the need to clean the
plastic surface manually. Plasma treatment is an effective process for both cleaning and activating difficult plastic surfaces
prior to powder coating.
This article illustrates this solution with examples of standard test plaques molded from of various blends of polypropylene, ABS, polycarbonate, ABS/Polycarbonate, and Nylon.
Plasma surface treatment was performed identically on each test
panel at a line speed of 20 FPM using a Plasmatreat RD1004
rotating nozzle laboratory system.
In order to promote electrostatic attraction of the powder
coating to the non-conductive plastics, a thin ( 10-12 micron)
conductive coating (Chemical Technology Inc. CTI-4386 or
CTI-1693 or similar product) was spray applied and air dried.
Next, an acrylated polyester UV curable powder coating was
electrostatically applied at a film thickness of 55-60 microns.
The test panels were heated in a 230F electric convection
oven for 10 minutes to allow the powder coating to melt and
flow smoothly over the surface of the panel surface. The test
plaques were cured using a (Fusion, 300W/in) gallium additive
UV lamp.
Full cure was confirmed by using 50 double rubs of methyl
ethyl ketone, with no measurable loss using a 60o gloss meter.
Adhesion on each panel was evaluated using standard crosshatch adhesion test method ASTM D 3359 (see Table 2).
This work provides several interesting insights. First, plasma
treatment had a pronounced improvement on coating adhesion
for a number of substrates. Polypropylene, polycarbonate, ABS
and ABS/PC panels which had no coating adhesion without
surface treatment, showed excellent adhesion after atmospheric
plasma treatment (see Figure 3). Second, there is still work to
be done. For example, the polypropylene tested according to
this method did not produce the same level of adhesion as we
obtained on ABS or ABS/polycarbonate blends and we could
not obtain adequate adhesion to Nylon 6 with plasma surface
treatment conditions test so far. Further improvements may be
achievable with refinement of the surface treatment process.
Another important observation is that while Some coating
and substrate combinations (for example the ABS/polycarbonate blend used here) sufficiently might work well without
surface treatment, this does not mean that plasma provides no
added benefit. Since many manufacturers report turning to using regrind or recycled materials to reduce cost, plasma provides
added insurance against failures by controlling the process even
when the resin composition might change from batch to batch.
We should also point out that our testing intentionally used
Figure 2: The Effect of Plasma Treatment (Using contact angle measurement)
Substrate Without
Plasma
With
Plasma
Polypropylene
ABS
Polycarbonate
ABS/Polycarbonate
Nylon 6
0B
0B
0B
4B
0B
3B
4B
4B
4B
0B
Table 2: Adhesion of UV powder to plastic substrates