10 years. Twenty-six percent had used a TMS between five
and nine years, and 31 percent had used this type of software for one to four years. Only 5 percent had used a TMS
for less than a year.
When asked what they used their TMS for, 84 percent of
respondents said it was to schedule domestic shipments,
which is precisely what the software was originally designed
to do. Another 79 percent said they used it for tendering
loads to carriers, while 57 percent used it for freight bill
audit/payment and 46 percent for tracking carrier performance. Only 31 percent used their TMS to schedule
international shipments. Although some industry pundits
predicted that shippers would use their transportation
management systems to help carriers comply with the new
truck driver hours-of-service rule, only 33 percent indicated they planned to use the software for that purpose.
Despite talk of more companies using software solutions
to improve workforce efficiency, the survey found that only
39 percent of respondents are using labor management systems—either on a standalone basis or as part of their WMS.
The results also showed that just 12 percent of respondents
had deployed a yard management system, which is used to
coordinate the movement of trailers and trucks at a DC site.
GROWING INTEREST IN BIG DATA
In the past year, there’s been considerable talk about the
use of big data analysis to fine-tune supply chain operations. As the name implies, big data analysis involves sifting
through millions of bits and bytes of information for new
insights into a company’s business practices. Typically, the
information comes from diverse sources—anything from
telematics and sensors on carriers’ equipment to radio-fre-quency identification (RFID) tags affixed to cases or items
to social media chatter. The idea is that by analyzing these
disparate sets of data, the software might detect hidden
connections or patterns that could ultimately be parlayed
into supply chain operational improvements.
Despite all the hype, only 43 percent of survey respondents
said they were engaging in big data analysis right now. When
asked about their reasons for doing so, respondents indicated it was to obtain recommendations for solving operational
problems, to better understand their supply chain, and to
examine hypothetical situations. (See Exhibit 2.)
The flip side, of course, is that 57 percent of respondents
are not engaging in big data analysis at this time. When
asked why, 40 percent said they perceived no value from it.
Another 19 percent said they didn’t have the time for additional work, and 14 percent said they lacked IT support,
generally seen as critical for this undertaking. Another 7
percent said this type of analysis was too expensive. (See
Exhibit 3.)
Yet despite the relatively slow uptake, many experts still
believe that supply chain and logistics operations are good
candidates for big data analysis. Based on reader responses,
it appears software vendors may have to develop more low-cost, intuition-based products and then demonstrate their
value before logistics managers will be persuaded to take
the plunge.
Overseeing warehouse inventory 91%
Directing receiving, putaway, and picking 82%
Cycle counting 78%
Label printing 73%
Managing business rules for task/inventory
customization 46%
Serving as an interface with automated
equipment 44%
Analytics 41%
Managing warehouse labor 36%
Error handling 35%
Dynamic slotting 28%
Dock scheduling 27%
EXHIBIT 1
What functions do readers use
WMS for?
To recommend solutions to problems 17%
To better understand our supply chain 13%
To examine hypothetical situations 3%
All of the above 68%
EXHIBIT 2
Why companies use big data
analysis ...
EXHIBIT 3
... and why they don’t
No perceived value 40%
No time for additional work 19%
Lack of IT support 14%
Too expensive 7%
Other 19%