Table 2
Chemical and corrosive resistance linked to Tg. The degree of
blistering, discoloration and/or rust are considered. The curing
condition is given together with Tg in the top row. The results
recorded here are after six-months of exposure for chemical
tests, 250 days for the rest (or until failure).
One explanation to these phenomena might be that the
small water molecules migrate somewhat into the paint film,
which in turn causes the film to soften to some degree. This
temporary swelling, in addition to the higher temperature,
might increase the molecular movements of the unreacted
polymer side chains and/or the amine hardeners enough to
make for a better cure than the one achieves using just hot
air (resulting in a higher Tg). When the water is removed
and the paint ventilated most of the trapped water evaporates, leaving behind a fully cured paint film.
One might argue that not all the water leaves the film,
but some molecules remain, acting as a softening agent.
This is why we see an increase in the molecular crosslink
density, calculated from storage modulus (
see equation [1]
on page 28).
Of course, these are only mere hypotheses, which need
further study to accept or reject. However, if one assumes
these hypotheses to be valid, further study is needed to
see if the painted steel is affected by the uptake of water
into the paint film.
Table 3
Tg is the glass transition temperature maximum found from the
tan δcurve. E'm is the minimum storage modulus while. TE'm is
the temperature at minimum storage modulus. Mc,min is the
crosslink density at E'm. The “curing conditions” column gives
the curing temperatures with number of days in brackets.
In actual application oil is often used for post curing
and as seen from Table 3 this differed to some extent
from post curing with hot water. The molecular crosslink
density, M 0c, is almost half that seen for the water
immersed panels.
One possible explanation for this effect is that both
water and oil work as a softening agent, but oil to a lesser degree than water due to the obvious difference in
molecular size.
The storage modulus curves of the coating post cured
in different media are shown below in Figure 8.
Figure 8
This figure shows how storage modulus are affected by varying
the post cure medium.