Research
performed by
HBR, Reinartz &
Kumar indicates
that long-term customer
loyalty does
not necessarily
produce high
profits from that
group.
by Phil Phillips, PhD
Contributing Editor
phillips@chemarkconsulting.net
Research performed by a noted organi- zation (HBR, Reinartz & Kumar) in- dicates that long-term customer loyalty
(customer “stickiness”) does not necessarily
produce high profits from that group.
We have this built-in notion that a loyal cus-
tomer over the years provides for higher than
average profit contributions. Subordinated in
this belief are certain claims or truisms. Here
are those “truisms”:
Long-term loyal customers cost less to serve.
Those who support this theory argue that loyal
customers have lower overall costs since the
up-front costs of acquiring them are amortized
over a large number of dealings. That argument
presupposes that these loyal customers have
been profitable in those historical transactions.
A more plausible argument for this “loyalty
link” is lower maintenance costs could be built
on the fact there should be less hand-holding
over the years.
These long-term loyal customers pay higher
prices versus other customers. If loyalty does
not necessarily lower costs, then perhaps it
generates more revenue. There are those who
might debate that their loyal customers realize
the cost of switching to another supplier is too
high, therefore, the loyal customer is willing to
accept higher prices.
Reality says that long-term customers in
fact pay lower prices than do newer customers . . . between five percent and seven percent lower. In general, then, it seems that a
loyal customer is actually more price sensitive
than an occasional one. There is evidence of
a strong resentment against companies that
attempt to leverage price increases and profit
from loyalty.
Loyal customers market the company.
Some feel that the more frequent custom-
ers are also the strongest advocates for your
company. There is a belief that loyal cus-
tomers (by word-of-mouth) help bring in
new customers. Evidence says that the link
between customer longevity and the propen-
sity to market by word-of-mouth was not
that strong.
Choosing a LOYALTY Strategy
When choosing a loyalty strategy we segment
four types of customers into high and low profit
contributors and then into short-term and long-
term customers. Each has a particular strategy
for handling successfully:
• Humming Birds: Are quick to change,
never staying in one place very long. These
are short-term high profit customers.
Challenge is to cease investing soon eough.
• Great Friends: Long-term good fit; highest
profit potential; investment is encouraged
• Alien: This customer has little company fit and low profitability; no investment is recommended.
• Crustacean: limited company fit; low
profit potential; these customers many
times become long-term loyal customers and tend to slow the organization in
the process.
The conclusion from these inputs basically
says... No company should ever take for granted the idea that managing customers for loyalty is the same as managing them for profits.
Loyalty is nice to have because it provides some
since of security as a solid continuum base but
it should never be assumed to provide extraordinary profits. CW
Dr. Phil Phillips is owner and managing director of CHEMARK Consulting Group, a global
management consulting firm specializing in
coatings, paints, adhesives, sealants and specialty chemicals industries. Dr. Phillips strengths
lie in strategic planning and implementation;
M&A methodologies; value chain development
and management best practices. For more information go to www. chemarkconsulting.net.
Customer “Stickiness”...Or...Customer “Loyalty”...
Is It Profitable?