by Phil Phillips, PhD
Contributing Editor
phillips@chemarkconsulting.net
Last month we covered the basics of analytics and what potentially it could do going forward. This
month we wanted to isolate on the topic of
its effect and potential as a marketing tool.
McKinsey covered this topic
very well in their Harvard Business
Review, November 5, 2015 article...
QUALIFYING THE IMPACT OF
MARKETING ANALYTICS.
It is a fact that marketing analyt-
ics is becoming very attractive tool and
potentially a “big business.” There is, as
McKinsey points out, “a buying frenzy”
associated with the “promise of improved
precision and performance, advanced an-
alytics and BIG DATA have set off.”
That being said, what are the corpo-
rate investments being made in it and
what is the current and future impact of
those investments?
Currently, the types of uses of analytic
marketing activity and their respective
use percentages are impressive as can be
seen in this chart.
McKinsey reports that of their respective marketing budgets and over the next
three years, companies will spend 11.1%,
up from 6.7% currently. Additionally,
major brands plan to increase their analytics spending by “73% over the next
three years”.
According to VentureBeat, in 2015,
more than a billion dollars have been invested in data analytics companies and the
number of marketing tech companies has
doubled to almost 2000 this year alone.
Now we know that a great deal of re-
sources are being placed into this space
called ANALYTICS. But what about the
impact of all this “frenzy” on key busi-
ness elements like...
• Marketing Analytics ROI
improvement?
• Marketing effectiveness?
Part of the overall problem lies in how
one quantifies the impact and, equally important, how does this transform into decisions about investing in and using analytics?
In a CMO (Chief Marketing
Technologist) Survey it created a metric that
reflected the number of ways companies use
marketing analytics in 11 areas. The results
showed strong support of marketing analytics use to ROI, thus supporting spending on
analytics in the marketing arena.
Considering the table referred to earlier, the facts seem to show there is a great
deal of room for improvement. The example given was Customer Acquisition
being the highest activity use at 36.6%,
represents the only instance where more
than one third of companies use analytics.
CONCLUSION: Marketing analytics
have major bottom line and ROI impact;
however, their use is amazingly limited.
Additionally, the McKinsey ar-
ticle talks to the question . . . “how can
companies get more from their invest-
ments in marketing analytics?”
Three things must be successfully
overcome...
• These generated insights fail to get to
the right people . . . the people who
can use them.
• Delivering both analysis and insights
from the data requires complex series of hand-offs. This leaves ample
room for miscommunications.
• Poor articulation of the goals of the
use of marketing analytics, a lack of
focus on what it takes to get it right,
and limited application of learned
lessons across the organization.
To avoid these problems, McKinsey
recommends...
• Using analytics for just 1-2 new mar-
keting activities at first and,
• Creating a heat map of current capa-
bilities across marketing activities and
comparing with industry leaders. CW
Dan Adams, President of the AIM
Institutre contributed content to this
article.
Part 2 of a 2 Part Series
Marketing & Analytics