EVERY SO OFTEN, A NEED TO GET RIGHT WITH “THE INFRAstructure” rises to the top of the bottle, only it’s not necessarily
cream. The industry has been railing against infrastructure negligence for decades. After a bare handful of legislative actions at the
federal level, even the two major parties’ presidential candidates
committed to infrastructure rebuild in the recent campaign.
But the most pugnacious fly in the ointment, the estimable and
formidable Mitch Mac Donald, has raised a couple of infrastructure
issues, namely the physical and enabling technology as priorities.
Your ’umble correspondent has waxed eloquent about infrastructure components in the past, but they were different in focus and
intensity from Mitch’s observations.
The politicians are ready to pounce on yesterday’s infrastructure as a sure way to solve
tomorrow’s challenges, in much the same way
that generals study past failures as guides to future
victories by learning how to win the last war.
It’s not just politicians imagining that Israeli-Palestinian peace is a slam-dunk in an enlightened
global community, or generals believing that the
Mau-Mau would flee like rabbits when faced with
heavy armament, or great minds in control of
the exchequer who would invest in rotting bridges (last-mile solutions) or crumbling highways
(long-distance movement) when there are constituencies that vote
reliably to which they can pander. But candidates and incumbents
are determined to spend on yesterday’s physical infrastructure, deficits notwithstanding and relevance in question.
Football coaches devise offenses to outsmart the defenses of 30
years ago. Or create defenses to confound offenses abandoned for
ineffectiveness 20 years ago. Dude! The Single Wing went out with
piston warplanes!
Thus, it makes sense for supply chain management (SCM) professionals to periodically revisit what makes up an SCM infrastructure
and what the priorities within infrastructure need to be.
TODAY’S INFRASTRUCTURE HOT BUTTONS
There is a handful of imperatives to be addressed, and now. These
are a subset of the fuller list of infrastructure components listed in
earlier writing, and they expand on Mitch’s concerns regarding the
physical elements and the role of consistent, visible, and coherent
technology support.
The physical/technology hardware must be brought up to the
standards and capabilities and capacities of advanced Western
BY ART VAN BODEGRAVEN basictraining
Infrared infrastructure
nations. Communications, Internet, everything.
The traditional bridge/highway network needs to
be elevated to a sustainable high level.
The difference between now and earlier is that
the new and remedial work has to be accomplished to a comprehensive plan, a sequence
of priorities that recognizes relative GDP (gross
domestic product) impacts and ties into a whole,
as opposed to a random collection of unrelated make-work projects that reward loyal voters
or woo desirable battleground states. Significant
attention must be paid, in Willy
Loman’s words, to long-haul
and short-haul movement,
including exits, ramps, congestion reduction, smooth transfer
interchanges, and easy urban
movement. Where appropriate,
rail, seaport, inland waterway,
and pipeline modes need to be
included in the plan—as well as
integrated with passenger alternatives.
As to technology, there isn’t
any without skills development, to be addressed
below.
THE HUMAN INFRASTRUCTURE
Important as the physical component is, our
supply chains simply won’t work without people—people with the right skills, the right education, the right attitudes, and the right roles and
responsibilities.
It begins with raw execution. We simply don’t
have enough forklift drivers, truckers, and order
pickers to meet today’s needs and customer commitments, and will need Evel Knievel’s motorcycle to leap over tomorrow’s looming entry-level
worker gap. Compounding the challenge, we
don’t have programs to build and fill an execution
labor pipeline, the landscape being littered with
bits and pieces of unrelated and uncoordinated
initiatives in various corporations and schools.
We are not remotely close to developing the