magnetic field, leading the vehicle to follow the tape.
A variation on this theme is a magnetic grid, which
uses magnets affixed to or embedded in the floor in a grid
pattern. An onboard sensor detects the magnets, and the
reference points are stored in the AGV’s memory as X and
Y coordinates. A gyroscope on the vehicle measures and
maintains direction, and a wheel encoder calculates the
distance traveled. In a magnetic grid, the guide paths can
easily be changed.
Still another option is inertial navigation, where transponders are embedded in the floor. An onboard gyroscope
detects slight directional changes and corrects the vehicle’s
travel path to keep it on course. Providers such as Daifuku’s
Jervis B. Webb division note that inertial guidance vehicles
can operate in almost any environment, including tight
aisles and extreme temperatures.
NEWER KIDS ON THE BLOCK
More recently developed guidance technologies rely on var-
ious ways of measuring distances, mapping, storing data,
and decision making for navigation. All provide a degree
of flexibility that earlier technologies couldn’t offer—
probably the biggest reason for the inroads AGVs are now
making in warehouses and DCs. They all make it easy and
fast to reprogram routes, require no (or, in the case of laser
guidance, minimal) additional infrastructure, and can nav-
igate on their own around obstacles.
Laser-guided vehicles map and store the facility layout
in the vehicle’s computer. A laser transmitter/receiver
mounted on the vehicle detects reflective strips located at
fixed reference points and measures both its distance and
angle relative to the reflectors. By triangulating two reference points, the AGV can determine and update its location. AGV maker JBT Corp., for example, says its patented
laser-guidance technology uses an eye-safe laser scanner
that “strobes” the operating area and updates its position
several times per second, resulting in highly accurate positioning. Transbotics, another AGV developer, touts laser
guidance for its accuracy, reliability, security, dynamic traffic management, and short installation times.
Natural-feature guidance is a relative newcomer to the
AGV scene. AGVs equipped with this type of technology
record and store reference images as a map of the operating area. They then navigate by calculating their position
relative to existing features—walls, racks, I-beams, doorways, stacks of pallets, and so forth—following the most
efficient path, just as a human being would when walking
through the facility. A major advantage of this technology
is that it requires no markers, transponders, or reflectors.
In addition, guide paths can easily be changed by retraining
the AGV or by drawing a new route on the map. Sweden’s
Kollmorgen was one of the first to develop this capability,
and others have followed. AutoGuide, for example, is about
to introduce a low-profile AGV that measures the locations
of natural features to use as reference points as it moves
along its route, says Sarah Carlson, vice president of marketing and business development.
In somewhat similar fashion, the Otto Motors division
of Clearpath Robotics uses simultaneous localization and
mapping (SLAM) technology for its self-driving material
handling vehicles—the same underlying technology used in
self-driving highway vehicles, says Simon Drexler, director
of industrial solutions. Otto uses laser-based “lidar” (from
“light” and “radar”) scanning to gather data and construct a
highly detailed map of the facility floor. Once it has the reference map, it can navigate any route without a defined path
or line. The vehicle is intelligent enough to plan and follow
its own route, Drexler says. Once the reference map is in
place, users can drag and drop location pins on the map to
instruct the vehicle where to stop for pickups and dropoffs.
Vehicles that use vision-based navigation come closest to processing visual information the way a human
being does. AGVs built by Seegrid, which pioneered this
technology, use five pairs of stereo cameras to record the
surrounding environment as an operator “trains” them by
walking them through their route. The cameras take two
images simultaneously, achieving binocular vision with
54 DC VELOCITY NOVEMBER 2016 www.dcvelocity.com
m
at
er
i
a
lh
a
n
d
l
i
ng
u
p
d
at
e
AU
TOMA
T
ED
GUID
ED
V
EHI
C
L
E
S
Who makes automated
guided vehicles?
Just a few years ago, only a handful of companies were
designing, making, and selling automated guided vehicles (AGVs). Today, there are quite a number of vendors
and types of automated vehicles, including load carriers, load lifters, driverless forklifts, tuggers, low-profile
carriers, and automated carts.
Interested in checking them out? This is by no means
a comprehensive list, but the following are some of the
AGV providers we’ve run across:
AutoGuide ( www.autoguideagvs.com)
Balyo ( www.balyo.com/us)
Clearpath Robotics ( www.ottomotors.com)
Daifuku North America ( www.daifuku.com/us)
Dematic ( www.dematic.com/en-us/)
Egemin ( www.egeminusa.com)
Hyster Co. ( www.hyster.com)
JBT ( www.jbtc-agv.com)
Kollmorgen ( www.ndcsolutions.com)
Kuka ( www.kuka-robotics.com/usa/en/)
Raymond ( www.raymondcorp.com)
Savant Automation ( www.agvsystems.com)
Seegrid ( seegrid.com)
Swisslog ( www.swisslog.com/en)
Toyota ( www.toyotaforklift.com)
Transbotics ( www.transbotics.com)
Yale Materials Handling Corp. ( www.yale.com)