newsworthy
A proposal by the U.S. Postal Service
(USPS) to raise rates by 7 percent on
parcels weighing one pound or less
and moving under the quasi-gov-ernmental agency’s “Parcel Select”
service reflects two realities: that the
product is popular, and that its popularity stems from the fact that it is
priced cheaply.
Along with the rate proposal for
lightweight parcels, USPS’s board of
governors filed a request with the
Postal Regulatory Commission, the agency that oversees
USPS pricing, for a 4.9-percent increase on all other transactions moving under Parcel Select. Customers using the
product induct packages deep into the postal infrastructure
for delivery to their final destinations, the vast majority of
them residences.
By law, USPS must serve every U.S. address, and it serves
approximately 156 million addresses today. Parcel Select is
priced inexpensively because USPS’s costs are already sunk
into the daily pickups and deliveries that must occur anyway.
It is believed that Parcel Select represents the best cost-ser-vice value for packages weighing less than 10 pounds.
In addition, USPS proposed a 6-percent increase on its
“Commercial Plus” product, in which business-to-business customers get volume discounts if they tender 5,000
first-class packages or 50,000 “Priority Mail” packages per
year. Priority Mail is a two- to three-day delivery service.
On average, rates on USPS’s “shipping services” products,
which include Priority Mail and Parcel Select, will rise 3. 9
percent in 2018, USPS said. All increases, which are subject
to Postal Regulatory Commission approval, would take
effect Jan. 18.
An industry source said the magnitude of the Parcel Select
rate increases might be USPS’s way of deliberately tamping
down demand for the product. “The Parcel Select method
has grown too much, while other methods have not grown
enough,” said the source, who requested anonymity.
USPS’s shipping services represent the fastest-growing
segment of its operations. However, they generate relatively
thin margins because the handling and processing of parcels is more time- and labor-intensive than the handling
of first-class letters, whose processing is heavily automated.
Volumes for letters, which are by far USPS’s most profitable
line, are in secular decline due to the digitization of traditional postal services.
Could USPS’s Parcel Select rate
hikes be aimed at discouraging
its use?