DC Velocity - October 2017

I RECENTLY HEARD A PODCAST ON THE DUNNING-KRUGER effect. I’m sure you have encountered fellow employees, subordinates, bosses, and others in your daily life who feel they are highly skilled and among the best workers in their fields. But in reality, they don’t have a clue. What’s more, they are often annoying in their bravado.

Putting a name to this familiar phenomenon was the work of Professor
David Dunning and his research assistant Justin Kruger of Cornell
University. They revealed their findings in a 1999 paper titled “Unskilled
and Unaware of It.”
Dunning and Kruger conducted a series of tests asking students to
assess their own abilities. What they discovered is
that students who performed in the bottom of their
class—around the 11th to 13th percentile—actually
thought they were among performers in the 60th to

70th percentile. They believed themselves to be highly competent, besting the majority, but were actually quite incompetent. They also believed that they were so skilled that they possessed the ability to teach others. They completely misjudged their abilities.

Another odd research finding was that people who are good performers actually think that they score worse than they do. They believe their performance is merely average.

Such self-perceptions can be a problem if you’re a manager with supervisory responsibilities. Not only will incompetent workers make mistakes, but they are also unlikely to catch and correct the mistakes or change their ways. This can lead to performance issues and even jeopardize safety.

So, how do you as a supervisor deal with people who feel they are highly skilled when they aren’t? How do you interact with people who believe you are treating them unfairly when you attempt to correct performance that they feel is already exemplary?

These dilemmas point up the importance of performance-based data. Labor management software, picking solutions, driver logs, and other technologies available today all have the capability to accurately monitor and track performance. Rather than basing evaluations on opinion, these tools can provide objective data on individual work. They also provide supervisors with a way to make fair comparisons among employees and teams performing similar tasks. Using these tools is essential for managers to provide fact-based evidence to the employees they supervise. It is a way to counter the Dunning-Kruger effect.

As for dealing with a boss who is unskilled and unaware—I think you’re on your own for that one.

bigpicture

Chief Editor
David Maloney
Chief Editor
dmaloney@dcvelocity.com
Karen Bachrach
Executive Editor - Features
karen@dcvelocity.com
Mark Solomon
Executive Editor - News
mark@dcvelocity.com
Martha Spizziri
Managing Editor - Digital
martha@dcvelocity.com
Ben Ames
Senior Editor
ben@dcvelocity.com
Toby Gooley
Senior Editor
tgooley@dcvelocity.com
Susan Lacefield
Editor at Large
slacefield@dcvelocity.com
Steve Geary
Editor at Large
sgeary@dcvelocity.com
Victoria Kickham
Contributing Editor
victoria@dcvelocity.com
Diane Rand
Associate Editor–Digital
diane@dcvelocity.com
Keisha Capitola
Director of Creative Services
keisha@dcvelocity.com
Jeff Thacker
Director of eMedia
jeff@dcvelocity.com
Columnists:
Clifford F. Lynch
Art van Bodegraven
Gary Master
Publisher
gmaster@dcvelocity.com
Mitch Mac Donald
Group Editorial Director
mitch@dcvelocity.com
Peter Bradley
Editor Emeritus
Jim Indelicato
Group Publisher
jindelicato@dcvelocity.com
EDITORIAL OFFICE
Tower Square, Number 4