t
ec
h
n
o
l
o
gyr
e
vi
e
w
SU
P
P
LY
CH
AIN
S
OF
T
WA
R
E
fifth place on the list, cited by 35 percent, was analytics, a
software category that’s gaining in importance. (For the full
list, see Exhibit 1.)
The ranking of the software tools in the middle also came
as little surprise. Although demand planning offers value to
companies selling or making thousands of stock-keeping
units (SKUs), many of their smaller counterparts still aren’t
using sophisticated software tools for forecasting. Similarly,
inventory optimization tends to be used by companies
struggling to manage the inventory for thousands of SKUs
across several locations.
The tools ranked on the bottom of this list are either of
interest to a narrow base or are new technology. For example, distributed order management systems were used by
10 percent. This type of software is deployed specifically by
omnichannel retailers to determine whether to fill an online
order from a store or a warehouse/DC. Another application,
the control tower system, which was also cited by 10 percent,
is a nascent technology that’s now only being deployed by
multinational companies to manage the end-to-end supply
chain. Ten percent of respondents were using trade management software, an application only of value to companies
involved in cross-border trade. Finally, 8 percent were using
demand sensing, an advanced application used currently by
leading-edge consumer product companies to quickly discern changes in consumer buying preferences.
Thirty percent of those surveyed had bought new supply
chain software in the past year. Most of the purchases were
WMS packages, which were bought by 33 percent. Twenty-four percent bought a new TMS. Interestingly, the third
most frequently purchased type of software was analytics,
cited by 15 percent—another indication in our survey that
more and more companies are interested in using software
intelligence to gain insights into their operations.
THE PAYBACK STRUGGLE CONTINUES
The survey found that many companies are still struggling
with the issue of payback on their software purchases.
Although 43 percent of respondents said they had received
the expected payback from a purchase, an equal number
said they were unsure as to whether they had recouped
their investment. On the other hand, 14 percent were
firm in their view that their company had not received the
expected return on their supply chain software investment.
Given that a supply chain software license or subscription
can run into the thousands of dollars and entail additional
fees for consulting, training, and systems integration, many
companies are clearly struggling with the issue of return on
investment (ROI).
As the survey made clear, when it comes to payback,
expectations vary all over the map. At one end of the spec-
two years ( 10 percent), within six months ( 8 percent), and
within three years ( 5 percent). It should be noted that 38
percent of survey takers said they did not know what the
time frame was for expected payback at their company.
Many companies have found that cloud-based software
provides a faster ROI than the traditional on-premise
deployments; in fact, 49 percent of the respondents that are
using cloud software said that this deployment method had
shortened payback. Because cloud solutions do not entail
added costs for installation, hardware, systems integration, maintenance, and custom coding, they are generally
less expensive to implement than traditional on-premise
applications. The lower upfront costs translate to a quicker
payback.
Given those benefits, it’s probably no surprise that the
percentage of users moving to the cloud has increased over
last year. Forty-five percent of survey respondents said that
they are using cloud deployment for at least one type of
supply chain software tool compared with only 33 percent
in last year’s survey.
GROWING USE OF ANALYSIS
The survey underscored the growing use of software intelligence to find answers to supply chain problems as well as
some of the issues that come with using these tools. Sixty-five percent of respondents said they are now using software
for analysis. What’s interesting is that only 32 percent are
using tools especially designed for analysis. That indicates
that many companies doing software analysis are taking
advantage of the embedded analytics that are increasingly
found in more advanced TMS, WMS, and inventory optimization (IO) packages.
When it comes to using software intelligence, almost
Warehouse management 50%
Enterprise resource planning 46%
Order management 43%
Transportation management 41%
Analytics 35%
Demand planning 30%
Advance planning and scheduling 26%
Inventory optimization 23%
Supply chain planning 22%
Labor/Work-force management 22%
Warehouse control 21%
Supply chain design/Network optimization 17%
Yard management 16%
Distributed order management 10%
Control tower 10%
Trade management 10%
Demand sensing 8%
EXHIBIT 1
What applications are readers using?
WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS REMAIN THE MOST WIDELY USED
SUPPLY CHAIN APPLICATION.