128 DC VELOCITY JULY 2016 www.dcvelocity.com
THE DETERIORATING CONDITION OF THE U.S. HIGHWAY
infrastructure is decidedly not “breaking news.” Quite the opposite. It is a decades-old problem that simply won’t go away. Despite
repeated calls for action—there have been over 20 commentaries
on the problem on this page alone in the past decade—the nation’s
roads and bridges continue to crumble. Even the “wake-up call”
that was the I- 35 bridge collapse in Minneapolis on Aug. 1, 2007,
wasn’t enough. Nearly nine years later, the phone is still ringing
and no one has picked up. One cannot help but wonder whether
anyone ever will.
For roughly the same period that we’ve used this page to sound
the alarm on infrastructure, we have also visited on multiple
occasions the topic of technology and how it is
changing the rules of the logistics game.
We all know that successful logistics execution in the 21st century is not just about the
efficient flow of goods through DCs and over
the roads, rails, and seas. It’s also about the efficient flow of information. To function properly, a logistics enterprise also requires a swift and
reliable infrastructure for moving data.
Based on a new report from two well-regarded academics, the IT infrastructure that
supports that parallel information flow isn’t
in particularly good shape either. In a white
paper titled “The Road to Profitability Is a
Web Service Connection,” Dr. Mary Holcomb
of the University of Tennessee and Dr. Karl
Manrodt of Georgia College & State University
argue that fulfilling modern delivery expectations will require an
overhaul of the freight transportation industry’s communication
infrastructure.
To swap freight information, shippers and carriers have traditionally relied on EDI (electronic data interchange), a communication system that dates back to the end of World War II. Though
it has undergone refinements during its nearly seven-decade history, EDI is now showing its age, the authors argue. Because it relies
on batch processing, EDI creates hours of delay and significant
gaps in information availability, rendering it basically unsuitable
for today’s high-velocity logistics operations.
Not only is it slow, it’s difficult to implement and expensive
to maintain. Before two companies can start to exchange data
via EDI, they must first agree on one of the many standards and
versions. Then there’s the question of the infrastructure needed to
support the process: the EDI software, communica-
tions software, mapping and translation software,
and more.
It’s a sign of a good researcher that he or she
doesn’t just identify the problem, but also offers
a solution. And the report’s authors do just that.
Their solution? Ditch EDI in favor of application
programming interfaces, widely known as APIs.
Similar to the technology that powers consumer
smartphone apps, the API messaging format allows
data to flow from one computer platform to another in nanoseconds. That might sound esoteric,
To drive home their point,
the authors invite us to consider
what our daily digital lives would
be like if we had to rely on EDI
In the transportation sector of logistics, that is
exactly what’s happening with the current data
infrastructure. Fortunately, it should be much easier—and quicker—to fix than the problems with our
roads and bridges.
Group Editorial Director
BY MITCH MAC DONALD, GROUP EDITORIAL DIRECTOR outbound
The other infrastructure problem